The habit and the way of growth in the tribe Cacteae (Cactaceae, Cactoideae)

  • Monserrat Vázquez-Sánchez Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
  • Teresa Terrazas Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
  • Salvador Arias Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Keywords: columnar, cylindric, globose, life form, plant architecture, shrub

Abstract

The terms ‘growth form’ and ‘habit’ are often used as synonyms. However, their assignment to different species is problematic because of the morphological diversity occurring in some taxonomic groups, as is the case in Cactaceae, particularly in the tribe Cacteae of the Cactoideae subfamily. Stem morphology was studied in 102 species (26 genera) of Cacteae in order to identify the habit and to recognize how many growth forms occur in the tribe, as well to make a distinction between the concepts of habit and growth form in Cactaceae, and to discuss the differences between them and the concepts of life form and plant architecture. Based on observations and measurements for 102 species of Cacteae, four growth forms (cylindrical, columnar, globose, and globose-depressed) were recognized. Neither the habit ‘tree’ or ‘herb’ can be assigned to any member of Cacteae based on their size or longevity. Twelve percent of the studied species of this tribe have basitonic branching (shrubs) as for Acharagma roseana, Ferocactus pilosus and Thelocactus bicolor. In order to avoid confusion, we suggest using only the term ‘growth form’ when referring to the various stem forms in the Cacteae tribe.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
The habit and the way of growth in the tribe Cacteae (Cactaceae, Cactoideae)

References

Albesiano S. y Fernández-Alonso J.L. 2006. Catálogo comentado de la flora vascular de la franja tropical (500-1200 m) del cañón del río Chicamocha (Boyacá-Santander, Colombia), Primera Parte. Caldesiana 28:23-44.

Altesor A., Silva C. y Ezcurra E. 1994. Allometric neoteny and the evolution of succulence in cacti. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 114:283-292.

Anderson E.F. 2001. The Cactus Family. Timber Press, Portland.

Barthélémy D. y Caraglio Y. 2007. Plant architectural: a dynamic, multilevel and comprehensive approach to plant form, structure and ontogeny. Annals of Botany 99:375-407.

Barthlott W. y Hunt D.R. 1993. Cactaceae. En: Kubitzki K. Ed. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants Volume II, pp. 161-197, Springer-Verlag, Berlín.

Bell A.D. y Bryan A. 2008. Plant Form: An Illustrated Guide to Flowering Plant Morphology. Timber Press, Portland.

Benson L. 1982. The Cacti of the United States and Canada. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

Bravo-Hollis H. 1978. Las Cactáceas de México. Vol. I. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F.

Bravo-Hollis H. y Sánchez-Mejorada H. 1991. Las Cactáceas de México. Vol. III. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F.

Boke N.H. 1976. Dichotomous branching in Mammillaria (Cactaceae). American Journal of Botany 63:1380-1384.

Buxbaum F. 1950. Morphology of Cacti. Section I. Roots and Stems. Abbey Garden Press, Pasadena.

Cody M.L. 1984. Distribution and morphology of columnar cacti in tropical deciduous woodland, Jalisco, Mexico. Vegetatio 66:137-146.

Cody M.L. 1986. Spacing patterns in Mojave Desert plant communities: near-neighbor analyses. Journal of Arid Environments 11:199-217.

Cody M.L. 1991. Niche theory and plant growth form. Vegetatio 97:39-55.

Cornejo D.O. y Simpson B.B. 1997. Analysis of form and function in North American columnar cacti (tribe Pachycereeae). American Journal Botany 84:1482-1501.

Craig R.T. 1989. The Mammillaria Handbook: with Descriptions, Illustrations, and Key to the Species of the Genus Mammillaria of the Cactaceae. Abbey Garden Press, Pasadena.

Díaz S., Gurvich D.E., Pérez-Harguindeguy N. y Cabido M. 2002. ¿Quién necesita tipos funcionales de plantas? Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica 37:135-140.

Dicht R.F. y Lüthy A.D. 2005. Coryphantha: Cacti of Mexico and Southern USA. Springer Verlag, Berlín.

Edwards E.J. y Donoghue M.J. 2006. Pereskia and the origin of the cactus life form. The American Naturalist 167:777-793.

Eggli U. 1993. Glossary of Botanical Terms with Special Reference to Succulent Plants. British Cactus and Succulent Society, Richmond.

Eggli U. y Newton L.E. 2004. Etymological Dictionary of Succulent Plant Names. Springer, Berlín.

Font Quer P. 1977. Diccionario de Botánica. Editorial Labor, Barcelona.

Garrett T.Y., Huynh C-V. y North G.B. 2010. Root contraction helps protect the “living rock” cactus Ariocarpus fissuratus from lethal high temperatures when growing in rocky soil. American Journal of Botany 97:1951-1960.

Geiger R., Aron R.H. y Todhunter P. 2003. The Climate Near the Ground. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Nueva York.

Gibson A.C. y Nobel P.S. 1986. The Cactus Primer. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Gibson J.D. 2009. Grasses and Grassland Ecology. Oxford University Press, Nueva York.

Godínez-Álvarez H., Valverde T. y Ortega-Baes P. 2003. Demographic trends in the Cactaceae. The Botanical Review 69:173- 203.

Gould S.J. 1977. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. The Bellknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Guzmán U., Arias S. y Dávila P. 2003. Catálogo de Cactáceas Mexicanas. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México/Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, México, D.F.

Hallé F., Oldeman R.A.A. y Tomlinson P.B. 1978. Tropical Trees and Forest: An Architectural Analysis. Springer-Verlag, Berlín.

Harris J.G. y Harris. M.W. 2001. Plant Identification Terminology. An Illustrated Glossary. Spring Lake Publishing, Payson.

Haustein E. 1988. The Cactus Handbook. Chartwell Books, Inc., Nueva Jersey.

Hernández-Hernández T., Hernández M.H., De-Nova J.A., Puente R., Eguiarte L.E. y Magallón S. 2011. Phylogenetic relationships and evolution of growth form in Cactaceae (Caryophyllales, Eudicotyledonae). American Journal of Botany 98:44-61.

Hickey M. y King C. 2000. The Cambridge Illustrated Glossary of Botanical Terms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Holmgren P.K., Keuken W. y Schofield E.K. 2001. Index Herbariorum. International Association for Plant Taxonomy. The New York Botanical Garden, Nueva York.

Hunt D.R. 1989. LVII. Cactaceae. En: The European Garden Flora Committee, Eds. The European Garden Flora, III, pp. 202-301, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Innes C. y Glass C. 1991. Cacti. Portland House, Nueva York.

Judd W.S., Campbell C.S., Kellogg E.A., Stevens P.F. y Donoghue M.J. 2002. Plant Systematics: A Phylogenetic Approach. Sinauer, Sunderland.

Kaplan D.R. 2001. The science of plant morphology: definition, history, and role in modern biology. American Journal of Botany 88:1711-1741.

Kaplan D.R. y Groff P.A. 1995. Developmental themes in vascular plants: functional and evolutionary significance. En: Hoch P.C. y Stephenson A.G. Eds. Experimental and Molecular Approaches to Plant Biosystematics, pp. 111-145, Missouri Botanical Garden, San Luis.

Kiesling R. 1999. Cactaceae. En: Zuloaga F.O. y Morrone O. Eds. Catálogo de las Plantas Vasculares de la República Argentina II, p. 423-489, Missouri Botanical Garden, San Luis.

Kiesling R., Faundez L., Larocca J. y Albesiano S.A. 2008. Cactaceae. En: Zuloaga F.O., Morrone O. y Belgrano M. Eds. Catálogo de la Plantas Vasculares del Cono Sur (Argentina, Sur de Brasil, Paraguay y Uruguay) Volumen 2, pp. 1715-1830, Missouri Botanical Garden Press, San Luis.

Leuenberger B.E. 1986. Pereskia (Cactaceae). Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden No. 41, New York Botanical Garden Press, Nueva York.

Lincoln R.J., Boxshall G.A. y Clark P.F. 1996. Diccionario de Ecologia, Evolución y Taxonomía. Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, D.F.

Loup C. 1993. Premières données sur l’architecture des Cactaceae. Diplôme d’études, Université des Sciences et Techniques du Languedoc, Montpellier. 39 pp.

Moreno N.P. 1984. Glosario Botánico Ilustrado. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Sobre Recursos Bióticos, México, D.F.

Mueller-Dombois D. y Ellenberg H. 1974. Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, Nueva York.

Nyffeler R. 2002. Phylogenetic relationship in the cactus family (Cactaceae) based on evidence from trnK/matK and trnL-trnF sequences. American Journal of Botany 89:312-326.

Nobel P.S. 1988. Environmental Biology of Agaves and Cacti. Cambridge University Press, Nueva York.

Pavón N.P., Hernández-Trejo H. y Rico-Gray V. 2000. Distribution of plant life forms along an altitudinal gradient in the semi-arid valley of Zapotitlán, México. Journal of Vegetation Science 11:39-42.

Porter J.M., Kinney M.S. y Heil K.D. 2000. Relationship between Sclerocactus and Toumeya (Cactaceae) based on chloroplast trnL-trnF sequences. Haseltonia 7:8-23.

Price C.A. y Enquist B.J. 2006. Scaling of mass and morphology in plants with minimal branching: an extension of the WBE model. Functional Ecology 20:11-20.

Racine C.H. y Downhower J.F. 1974. Vegetative and reproductive strategies of Opuntia (Cactaceae) in the Galápagos Island. Biotropica 6:175-186.

Rauh R. 1979. Kakteen an ihren Standorten. Paul Parey, BerlínHamburgo.

Raunkiaer C. 1934. The Life Forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Taylor N. y Zappi D. 2004. Cacti of Eastern Brazil. Kew Publishing, Kew.

Vázquez-Sánchez M. y Terrazas T. 2011. Stem and wood allometric relationships in Cacteae (Cactaceae) Trees 25:755-767.

von Willert D.J., Eller B.M., Werger M.J.A. y Brinckmann E. 1990. Desert succulents and their life strategies. Vegetatio 90:133-143.

Published
2012-06-15
How to Cite
Vázquez-Sánchez, M., Terrazas, T., & Arias, S. (2012). The habit and the way of growth in the tribe Cacteae (Cactaceae, Cactoideae). Botanical Sciences, 90(2), 97-108. https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.477
Section
STRUCTURAL BOTANY / BOTÁNICA ESTRUCTURAL