Sexual systems of Tropical Dry Forest trees in restored habitats

  • María de los Ángeles Hernández-Galindo Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Escuela de Biología, Puebla
  • Cristina Martínez-Garza Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Conservación, Cuernavaca https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9310-564X
  • L. Fernando Rosas-Pacheco Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Hidalgo https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8721-0016
  • Luz María Ayestarán-Hernández Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Conservación, Cuernavaca https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1045-1000
keywords: Ecological value, non-timber forest products (NTFP), restoration plantings, Swietenia humilis, tropical deciduous forest, use value

Abstract

Background: Obligate outcrossing species (such as dioecious species) are more vulnerable to habitat fragmentation than self-compatible hermaphrodite trees.

Questions: What is the effect of restoration intervention in the populations of dioecious, monoecious, and hermaphrodite tree species in permanent agricultural landscapes?

Study site and dates: 8-year-old restoration settings in the seasonally dry tropical forest in Sierra de Huautla Biosphere Reserve, Morelos, Mexico.

Methods: We measure richness and density of dioecious, monoecious, and hermaphrodite tree species with Diameter at Breast Height ≥ 2.5 cm in perturbed, 8-year-old restoration settings (plantings and natural succession) and conserved habitats.

Results: Overall habitats, 2,042 trees from 46 species in 18 families were identified; the highest percentage of species and trees were hermaphrodites (63 % of species and 78 % of trees), the lowest percentage of species were monoecious (9 %) and the lowest percentage of trees (10 %) were dioecious. In the plantings were registered the largest number of species (37 species) and in the conserved habitat the largest number of trees (852 trees). Density and richness of dioecious, monoecious, and hermaphrodite species did not differ by habitat, contrary to our predictions. For dioecious trees, the restored and conserved habitats showed similar composition heterogeneity. Composition of hermaphrodites in agricultural landscapes differed the most with the conserved habitat.

Conclusions: Dioecious and monoecious species are favored in agricultural landscapes due to their use value. Selection of species for restoration plantings should consider sexual systems of trees to recover not only forest structure but also ecosystem function.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Cristina Martínez-Garza, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Conservación, Cuernavaca

Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva

Sexual systems of Tropical Dry Forest trees in restored habitats

References

Abad-Fitz I, Maldonado-Almanza B, Aguilar-Dorantes KM, Sánchez-Méndez L, Gómez-Caudillo L, Casas A, Blancas J, García-Rodríguez YM, Beltrán-Rodríguez L, Sierra-Huelsz JA, Cristians S, Moreno-Calles AI, Torres-García I, Espinosa-García FJ. 2020. Consequences of Traditional Management in the Production and Quality of Copal Resin (Bursera bipinnata (Moc. & Sessé ex DC.) Engl.) in Mexico. Forests 11: 991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f11090991

Aguilar R, Ashworth L, Galetto L, Aizen MA. 2006. Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis. Ecology Letters 9: 968-980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00927.x

Alba-García L. 2011. Reclutamiento de especies leñosas en la selva seca de Sierra de Huautla, Morelos, Mexico. BSc Thesis. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos.

Alvarado-Cárdenas LO. 2004. Apocynaceae Juss. Flora del Valle de Tehuacán-Cuicatlán 38: 1-57. ISBN: 968-36-3108-8

Anderson MJ. 2001. A new method for non?parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26: 32-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x

Arias-Medellín LA, Flores-Palacios A, Martínez-Garza C. 2014. Cacti community structure in a tropical Mexican dry forest under chronic disturbance. Botanical Sciences 92: 405-415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.92

Ayestarán-Hernández LM. 2004. Ecología de la polonización y fenología reproductiva de Ipomoea pauciflora en la selva baja caducifolia de Sierra de Huautla, Morelos. BSc. Thesis. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos.

Banda-R K, Delgado-Salinas A, Dexter KG, Linares-Palomino R, Oliveira-Filho A, Prado D, Pullan M, Quintana C, Riina R, Rodríguez M. GM, Weintritt J, Acevedo-Rodríguez P, Adarve J, Álvarez E, Aranguren B. A, Arteaga JC, Aymard G, Castaño A, Ceballos-Mago N, Cogollo Á, Cuadros H, Delgado F, Devia W, Dueñas H, Fajardo L, Fernández Á, Fernández MÁ, Franklin J, Freid EH, Galetti LA, Gonto R, González-M. R, Graveson R, Helmer EH, Idárraga Á, López R, Marcano-Vega H, Martínez OG, Maturo HM, McDonald M, McLaren K, Melo O, Mijares F, Mogni V, Molina D, Moreno NdP, Nassar JM, Neves DM, Oakley LJ, Oatham M, Olvera-Luna AR, Pezzini FF, Dominguez OJR, Ríos ME, Rivera O, Rodríguez N, Rojas A, Särkinen T, Sánchez R, Smith M, Vargas C, Villanueva B, Pennington RT. 2016. Plant diversity patterns in neotropical dry forests and their conservation implications. Science 353: 1383-1387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf5080

Barrett SCH, Hough J. 2013. Sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 64: 67-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers308

Beltrán-Rodríguez L, Valdez-Hernández JI, Luna-Cavazos M, Romero-Manzanares A, Pineda-Herrera E, Maldonado-Almaza B, Borja-de la Rosa MA, Blancas-Vázquez J. 2018. Estructura y diversidad arbórea de bosques tropicales caducifolios secundarios en la Reserva de la Biósfera Sierra de Huautla, Morelos. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 89: 108-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2018.1.2004

Beltrán-Rodríguez L, Valdez-Hernández JI, Saynes-Vásquez A, Blancas J, Sierra-Huelsz JA, Cristians S, Martínez-Ballesté A, Romero-Manzanares A, Luna-Cavazos M, Borja de la Rosa MA, Pineda-Herrera E, Maldonado-Almanza B, Ángeles-Pérez G, Ticktin T, Bye R. 2021. Sustaining Medicinal Barks: Survival and Bark Regeneration of Amphipterygium adstringens (Anacardiaceae), a Tropical Tree under Experimental Debarking. Sustainability 13: 2860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052860

Blancas-Vázquez JJ, Caballero J, Beltrán-Rodríguez L. 2017. Los productos forestales no maderables de México. Fascículo 1. Panorama general. Mexico: Red Temática Productos Forestales No Maderables y Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología.

Breed MF, Ottewell KM, Gardner MG, Marklund MHK, Dormontt EE, Lowe AJ. 2015. Mating patterns and pollinator mobility are critical traits in forest fragmentation genetics. Heredity 115: 108-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2013.48

Budowski G, Russo RO. 1993. Live Fence Posts in Costa Rica. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 3: 65-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v03n02_07

Bullock SH. 1985. Breeding Systems in the Flora of a Tropical Deciduous Forest in Mexico. Biotropica 17: 287-301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2388591

Bullock SH. 1994. Wind Pollination of Neotropical Dioecious Trees. Biotropica 26: 172-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2388806

Bullock SH, Solís-Magallanes JA. 1990. Phenology of Canopy Trees of a Tropical Deciduous Forest in Mexico. Biotropica 22: 22-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2388716

Burgos A, Maass JM. 2004. Vegetation change associated with land-use in tropical dry forest areas of Western Mexico. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 104: 475-481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.038

Butler R, Montagnini F, Arroyo P. 2008. Woody understory plant diversity in pure and mixed native tree plantations at La Selva Biological Station, Costa Rica. Forest Ecology and Management 255: 2251-2263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.12.050

Bye R, Linares E, Mata R, Albor C, Castañeda PC Delgado G. 1991. Ethnobotanical and phytochemical investigation of Randia echinocarpa (Rubiaceae). Anales del Instituto de Biología. Serie Botanica 62: 87-106

Campbell DR. 2000. Experimental tests of sex-allocation theory in plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15: 227-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01872-3

Cano-Santana Z, López-Gómez V, Castellanos-Vargas I, Alejandre-Grimaldo S. 2020. Resumen ejecutivo. Diversidad de invertebrados. In: CONABIO, ed. La Biodiversidad en Morelos. Estudio de estado 2. Volumne II. Cuernavaca: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, pp. 23-26. ISBN: 978-607-8570-42-3.

Casimiro-Soriguer R, Herrera J, Talavera S. 2013. Andromonoecy in an Old World Papilionoid legume, Erophaca baetica. Plant Biology 15: 353-359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00648.x

Chazdon RL, Guariguata MR. 2016. Natural regeneration as a tool for large-scale forest restoration in the tropics: prospects and challenges. Biotropica 48: 716-730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12381

CONANP. 2005. Programa de Conservación y Manejo Reserva de la Biosfera Sierra Huautla. Cuernavaca, Morelos: Consejo Nacional de Areas Naturales Protegidas. ISBN: 968-817-744-X

Cruz-León A, Salazar-Martínez L, Campos-Osorno M. 2006. Antecedentes y actualidad del aprovechamiento de copal en la Sierra de Huautla, Morelos. Revista de Geografía Agrícola 37: 97-115.

de Jong TJ, Shmida A, Thuijsman F. 2008. Sex allocation in plants and the evolution of monoecy. Evolutionary Ecology Research 10: 1087-1109.

de la O-Toris J, Maldonado B, Martínez-Garza C. 2012. Efecto de la perturbación en la comunidad de herbáceas nativas y ruderales de una Selva Estacional Mexicana. Botanical Sciences 90: 469-480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.475

de la Peña-Domene M, Martínez-Garza C, Howe HF. 2013. Early recruitment dynamics in tropical restoration. Ecological Applications 23: 1124-1134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/12-1728.1

de la Peña-Domene M, Martínez-Garza C, Palmas-Pérez S, Rivas-Alonso E, Howe HF. 2014. Roles of Birds and Bats in Early Tropical-Forest Restoration. Plos One 9: e104656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104656

De León-Ibarra MA. 2005. Fenología de especies de plantas con frutos carnosos y disponibilidad espacial y temporal de este recurso en la Reserva de la Biosfera Sierra de Huautla: Implicaciones para los vertebrados. Bcs. Thesis. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos.

Dirzo R, Young HS, Mooney HA, Ceballos G. 2011. Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests. Washington: Island Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753398

Dorado O, Arias DM, Ramírez R, Sousa M. 2005. Leguminosas de la Sierra de Huautla. Imágenes y descripciones. Cuernavaca, Morelos, México: Centro de Educación Ambiental e Investigación Sierra de Huautla-Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos / Comisión Nacional para el conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. ISBN: 970-93476-9-1

Eckert CG, Kalisz S, Geber MA, Sargent R, Elle E, Cheptou PO, Goodwillie C, Johnston MO, Kelly JK, Moeller DA, Porcher E, Ree RH, Vallejo-Marin M, Winn AA. 2010. Plant mating systems in a changing world. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25: 35-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.013

Flores S, Schemske DW. 1984. Dioecy and monoecy in the flora of Puerto-Rico and the Virgin-Islands - ecological correlates. Biotropica 16: 132-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2387845

Gallardo-Cruz JA, Meave del Castillo J, Pérez-García EA. 2005. Estructura, composición y diversidad de la selva baja caducifolia del Cerro Verde, Nizanda (Oaxaca), México. Boletin de la Sociedad Botánica de México 76: 19-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.1701 10.17129/botsci.1701

Galeano G. 2000. Forest use at the pacific coast of chocó, colombia: A quantitative approach. Economic Botany 54: 358-376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02864787

Gann GD, McDonald T, Walder B, Aronson J, Nelson CR, Jonson J, Hallett JG, Eisenberg C, Guariguata MR, Liu J, Hua F, Echeverría C, Gonzales E, Shaw N, Decleer K, Dixon KW. 2019. International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Second edition. Restoration Ecology 27: S1-S46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13035

Gauch HJJ. 1982. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511623332

Gerhardt K. 1993. Tree Seedling Development in Tropical Dry Abandoned Pasture and Secondary Forest in Costa-Rica. Journal of Vegetation Science 4: 95-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3235736

Germán-Ramírez MT. 2005. Meliaceae. Flora del Valle de Tehuacán-Cuicatlán 42: 1-15. ISBN: 968-36-3108-8

González-Tokman D, Martínez-Garza C. 2015. Effect of Ecological Restoration on Body Condition of a Predator. Plos One 10: e0133551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133551

González-Tokman DM, Barradas VL, Boege K, Domínguez CA, del-Val E, Saucedo E, Martínez-Garza C. 2018. Performance of 11 tree species under different management treatments in restoration plantings in a tropical dry forest. Restoration Ecology 26: 642-649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12617

González-Villarreal LM. 1986. Contribución al conocimiento del genero Quercus (Fagaceae) en el estado de Jalisco. México: Instituto de Botánica. Universidad de Guadalajara.

Goodwillie C, Kalisz S, Eckert CG. 2005. The Evolutionary Enigma of Mixed Mating Systems in Plants: Occurrence, Theoretical Explanations, and Empirical Evidence. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36: 47-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.091704.175539

Grether R, Martínez-Bernal A, Luckow M, Zárate S. 2006. Mimosaceae. Tribu Mimoseae. Flora del Valle de Tehuacán-Cuicatlán 44: 1-108.

Griscom HP, Griscom BW, Ashton MS. 2009. Forest Regeneration from Pasture in the Dry Tropics of Panama: Effects of Cattle, Exotic Grass, and Forested Riparia. Restoration Ecology 17: 117-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00342.x

Griscom HP, Kalko EKV, Ashton MS. 2007. Frugivory by small vertebrates within a deforested, dry tropical region of Central America. Biotropica 39: 278-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2006.00242.x

Harvey CA, Medina A, Merlo Sanchez DM, Vilchez S, Hernández B, Saenz JC, Maes JM, Casanoves F, Sinclair FL. 2006. Patterns of animal diversity in different forms of tree cover in agricultural landscapes. Ecological Applications 16: 1986-1999. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1986:poadid]2.0.co;2

Hernández-Galindo MÁ. 2016. Fenología floral, expresión sexual de árboles y visitantes florales en sitios de restauración ecológica experimental en Sierra de Huautla, Morelos. BSc. Thesis. Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla.

Hilje B, Calvo-Alvarado J, Jimenez-Rodriguez C,Sanchez-Azofeifa A. 2015. Tree species composition, breeding systems, and pollination and dispersal syndromes in three forest successional stages in a tropical dry forest in Mesoamerica. Tropical Conservation Science 8: 76-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/194008291500800109

Howe HF, Martínez-Garza C. 2014. Restoration as experiment. Botanical Sciences 92: 459-468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.146

Instituto de Biología. "Bursera bicolor - IBUNAM:MEXU:OAX524897". UNIBIO: Colecciones Biológicas. 2011-08-12. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Consultada en: 2021-10-22. http://unibio.unam.mx/collections/specimens/urn/IBUNAM:MEXU:OAX524897

Jaimes I, Ramírez N. 1999. Breeding systems in a secondary deciduous forest in Venezuela: The importance of life form, habitat, and pollination specificity. Plant Systematics and Evolution 215: 23-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00984645

Juan-Baeza I, Martínez-Garza C, del-Val E. 2015. Recovering More than Tree Cover: Herbivores and Herbivory in a Restored Tropical Dry Forest. Plos One 10: e0128583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128583

Kennard DK. 2002. Secondary forest succession in a tropical dry forest: patterns of development across a 50-year chronosequence in lowland Bolivia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 18: 53-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467402002031

Lebrija-Trejos E, Meave JA, Poorter L, Pérez-García EA, Bongers F. 2010. Pathways, mechanisms and predictability of vegetation change during tropical dry forest succession. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics 12: 267-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2010.09.002

León-Velasco ME. 2005. Catálogo de las especies útiles de la familia Malpighiaceae en el Estado de México y zonas aledañas. BSc. Thesis. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Linares E, Bye R. 2008. El copal en México. Biodiversitas 78: 8-11.

Lugo AE. 1997. The apparent paradox of reestablishing species richness on degraded lands with tree monocultures. Forest Ecology and Management 99: 9-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00191-6

Machado IC, Lopes AV, Sazima M. 2006. Plant sexual systems and a review of the breeding system studies in the Caatinga, a Brazilian tropical dry forest. Annals of Botany 97: 277-287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcj029

Maldonado B, Caballero J, Delgado-Salinas A, Lira R. 2013. Relationship between Use Value and Ecological Importance of Floristic Resources of Seasonally Dry Tropical Forest in the Balsas River Basin, México. Economic Botany 67: 17-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-013-9222-y

Martínez-Garza C, Osorio-Beristain M, Alcalá R, Valenzuela-Galván D, Mariano N. 2016. Ocho años de restauración experimental en las selvas estacionales de México. In: Ceccon E, Martínez-Garza C, eds. Experiencias mexicanas en la restauración de ecosistemas. Mexico City: UNAM, pp. 385-406. ISBN: 978-607-8434-76-3

Martínez-Garza C, Osorio-Beristain M, Valenzuela-Galván D, Nicolás-Medina A. 2011. Intra and inter-annual variation in seed rain in a secondary dry tropical forest excluded from chronic disturbance. Forest Ecology and Management 262: 2207-2218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.08.013

Martínez-Garza C, Osorio-Beristain M, Valenzuela-Galván D, Alcalá-Martínez R, Rivas-Alonso E. 2021. Manejo y conservación de aves, roedores y murciélagos en paisajes agropecuarios permanentes en Sierra de Huautla, Morelos. In: del Val E, Mercado-Silva N, eds. Manejo y Conservación de Fauna en Ambientes Antropizados. México: Fondo Editorial Universidad Autónoma de Queretaro, pp. 103-131. ISBN: 978-607-513-552-6

Martínez-Gordillo M, Jiménez-Ramiréz J, Cruz-Durán R, Juárez-Arriaga E, García R, Cervantes A,Mejía-Hernández R. 2002. Los géneros de la familia Euphorbiaceae en México. Anales del Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Serie Botánica 73: 155-281.

Martínez-Pérez A. 2014. Efecto de los tratamientos de restauración ecológica en la regeneración de avanzada en la selva baja caducifolia de la Sierra de Huautla, Morelos, México. BCs. Thesis. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.

Martins R, Antonini Y. 2016. Can pollination syndromes indicate ecological restoration success in tropical forests? Restoration Ecology 24: 373-380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12324

Medina-Lemos R. 2000. Julianaceae. Flora del Valle de Tehuacán-Cuicatlán 30: 1-5. ISBN: 968-36-3108-8

Medina-Lemos R. 2008. Burseraceae. Flora del Valle de Tehuacán-Cuicatlán 66: 1-76. ISBN: 968-36-3108-8

Medina-Lemos R, Fonseca RM. 2009. Anacardiaceae. Flora del Valle de Tehuacán-Cuicatlán 71: 1-54. ISBN: 968-36-3108-8

Meli P, Rey-Benayas JM, Brancalion PHS. 2019. Balancing land sharing and sparing approaches to promote forest and landscape restoration in agricultural landscapes: Land approaches for forest landscape restoration. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation 17: 201-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2019.09.002

Mena-Jimenez F. 2018. Estrategias ecológicas y culturales para garantizar la disponibilidad de productos forestales no maderables: Árboles medicinales en la selva baja del sur de Morelos. Msc. Thesis. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos.

Menz MHM, Phillips RD, Winfree R, Kremen C, Aizen MA, Johnson SD, Dixon KW. 2011. Reconnecting plants and pollinators: challenges in the restoration of pollination mutualisms. Trends in Plant Science 16: 4-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2010.09.006

Monroy C. 1997. La leña como recurso energético, implicaciones ecológicas y etnobotánicas. Msc. Thesis. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Montoya-Pfeiffer PM, Rodrigues RR, Metzger JP, da Silva CI, Baquero OS, dos Santos IA. 2018. Are the assemblages of tree pollination modes being recovered by tropical forest restoration? Applied Vegetation Science 21: 156-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12335

Muller-Landau HC, Wright SJ, Calderón O, Hubbell SP, Foster RB. 2002. Assessing recruitment limitation: concepts, methods and case-studies from a tropical forest. In: Levey DJ, Silva WR, Galetti M, eds. Seed Dispersal and Frugivory. Wallingford: CAB International, pp. 35-53. ISBN: 978-085-199-5250

Nair RM, Dundas IS, Wallwork M, Verlin DC, Waterhouse L, Dowling K. 2004. Breeding system in a population of Trigonella balansae (Leguminosae). Annals of Botany 94: 883-888. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mch216

Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O'Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Henry M, Stevens H, Szoecs E, Wagner H. 2018. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan

Olliff-Yang RL, Gardali T, Ackerly DD. 2020. Mismatch managed? Phenological phase extension as a strategy to manage phenological asynchrony in plant–animal mutualisms. Restoration Ecology 28: 498-505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13130

Olvera-Luna AR, Gama-López S, Delgado-Salinas A. 2012. Fabaceae. Flora del Valle de Tehuacán-Cuicatlán 107:1-42. ISBN: 968-36-3108-8

Ortiz PL, Arista M, Oliveira PE, Talavera S. 2003. Pattern of flower and fruit production in Stryphnodendron adstringens, an andromonoecious legume tree of central Brazil. Plant Biology 5: 592-599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-44720

Pagaza-Calderón EM, Fernández-Nava R. 2004. La familia Bombacaceae en la cuenca del río Balsas, México. Polibotánica 17: 71-102.

Pennington RT, Sarukhán J. 2005. Árboles tropicales de México. Manual para la identificación de las principales especies. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica. ISBN: 9789703216437

Pérez-Calix E. 2009. Tiliaceae. Flora del bajío y de regiones adyacentes 160: 1-50.

Pérez-Calix E, Carranza-González E. 1999. Ulmaceae. Flora del bajío y de regiones adyacentes 75: 1-30. ISSN: 0188-5170

Pizo MA, dos Santos BTP. 2011. Frugivory, Post-feeding Flights of Frugivorous Birds and the Movement of Seeds in a Brazilian Fragmented Landscape. Biotropica 43: 335-342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2010.00695.x

Quesada M, Rosas F, Aguilar R, Ashworth L, Rosas-Guerrero V, Sagayo R, Lobo JA, Herrerías-Diego Y, Sánchez-Montoya G. 2011. Human impacts on pollination, reproduction, and breeding systems in Tropical Forest Plants. In: Dirzo R, Young HS, Mooney HA, Ceballos G, eds. Seasonally dry tropical forests. Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 173-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753398

R Core Team 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: https://www.Rproject.org/

Rico-Arce L, Rodríguez A. 1998. Mimosaceae. Tribu Acaciaceae. Flora del Valle de Tehuacán-Cuicatlán 20: 1-37. ISBN: 968-36-3108-8

Rodan BD, Newton AC, Verissimo A. 1992. Mahogany conservation - status and policy initiatives. Environmental Conservation 19: 331-338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0376892900031453

Rzedowski J, Calderon-Rzedowski G. 1993. Bignoniaceae. Flora del bajío y de regiones adyacentes 22: 1-48. ISSN: 0188-5170

Rzedowski J, Guevara-Féfer F. 1992. Burseraceae. Flora del bajío y de regiones adyacentes 3:1-43. ISSN: 0188-5170

Rzedowski J. 2006. Vegetación de México. México: Comisión para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad.

Seethapathy GS, Ravikumar K, Paulsen BS, de Boer HJ, Wangensteen H. 2018. Ethnobotany of dioecious species: Traditional knowledge on dioecious plants in India. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 221: 56-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2018.04.011

Solano E, Ayala MM. 2008. Polygonaceae. Flora del Valle de Tehuacán-Cuicatlán 63: 1-22. ISBN: 968-36-3108-8

Stanturf J, Mansourian S, Kleine M, eds. 2017. Implementing Forest Landscape Restoration, A Practitioner‘s Guide. International Union of Forest Research Organizations, Special Programme for Development of Capacities (IUFRO-SPDC) Vienna, Austria. ISBN: 978-3-902762-78-8

StatSoft I. 2004. STATISTICA for Windows (Computer program manual). 7.0. Tulsa, OK.

Terborgh J, Alvarez-Loayza P, Dexter K, Cornejo F, Carrasco C. 2011. Decomposing dispersal limitation: limits on fecundity or seed distribution? Journal of Ecology 99: 935-944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01836.x

Tewksbury JJ, Levey DJ, Haddad NM, Sargent S, Orrock JL, Weldon A, Danielson BJ, Brinkerhoff J, Damschen EI, Townsend P 2002. Corridors affect plants, animals, and their interactions in fragmented landscapes. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences 99: 12923-12926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.202242699

Vandermeer J, Carvajal R. 2001. Metapopulation dynamics and the quality of the matrix. American Naturalist 158: 211-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/321318

White GM, Boshier DH, Powell W. 1999. Genetic variation within a fragmented

population of Swietenia humilis Zucc. Molecular Ecology 8: 1899-1909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00790.x

Whitehead MR, Lanfear R, Mitchell RJ, Karron JD. 2018. Plant Mating Systems Often Vary Widely Among Populations. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 6: 38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2018.00038

Willmann D, Schmidt E-M, Heinrich M, Rimpler H. 2000. Verbenaceae. Flora del Valle de Tehuacán-Cuicatlán 27: 1-75. ISBN: 968-36-3108-8

Zar HJ. 1996. Biostatistical Analysis. Englewood: Prentice-Hall, Inc. ISBN: 1-292-02404-6

Zimmerman E, Prenner G, Bruneau A. 2013. Floral morphology of Apuleia leiocarpa (dialiinae: leguminosae), an unusual andromoecious legume. International Journal of Plant Sciences 174: 154-160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/668789

Published
2022-03-11
How to Cite
Hernández-Galindo, M. de los Ángeles, Martínez-Garza, C., Rosas-Pacheco, L. F., & Ayestarán-Hernández, L. M. (2022). Sexual systems of Tropical Dry Forest trees in restored habitats. Botanical Sciences, 100(3), 515-533. https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.2971
Section
ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION / RESTAURACIÓN ECOLÓGICA