La Ecosystem restoration in Mexico: insights on the project planning phase

keywords: ecosystem services, forest landscape restoration, reference ecosystem, remediation, socioecological complexity, unassisted forest regeneration


Background: A deep discussion of the phases of planning by all stakeholders will help to identify the challenges faced by countries that are embarking on large-scale restoration actions to comply with international agreements.

Question: Was the planning phase of restoration projects done according to international guidance? We evaluated six of the eight aspects of the international guidance for the planning phase of restoration projects carried out in Mexico between 1979 and 2016.

Methods: The information about the restoration projects was compiled using a digital survey composed of 137 questions.

Results: Seventy-five projects with a total area of 1,556,840 hectares were analyzed, mainly in temperate, humid, and deciduous forest. More projects measured the baseline with biotic than with abiotic variables, and social variables were seldom evaluated. Most projects aimed to recover biodiversity or ecosystem services, and they identified a reference ecosystem. Planned budgets included mainly field work.

Conclusions: To promote the integration of ecological, social, and economic priorities, landscape restoration is suggested, since it is done at a scale which maximizes the benefits for nature and people. The inclusion of only field work in the budgets may decrease the total cost, but it may jeopardize project success due to poor planning. Careful and detailed planning of a national strategy constructed by all stakeholders that includes restoration of original ecosystems, agroforestry systems (which facilitate social participation and increase land productivity) and patches under natural succession, and investing in highly trained human resources will allow successful compliance with international restoration commitments.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Cristina Martínez-Garza, Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Conservación, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos

Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva

La Ecosystem restoration in Mexico: insights on the project planning phase


Alfie-Cohen M. 2015. Conflictos socio-ambientales: la minería in Wirikuta y Cananea. El cotidiano 191: 97-108.
Baker S, Eckerberg K, Zachrisson A. 2014. Political science and ecological restoration. Environmental Politics 23: 509-524. DOI:10.1080/09644016.2013.835201
Bonn-Challenge. 2019. Reto de
CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). 2010. Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011 – 2020 and the Aichi Targets.
Ceccon E. 2013. Restauración en bosques tropicales: fundamentos ecológicos, prácticos y sociales. Mexico: Ediciones Díaz de Santos. ISBN:978-84-9969-615-7
Ceccon E, Barrera-Cataño JI, Aronson J, Martínez-Garza C. 2015. The socioecological complexity of ecological restoration in Mexico. Restoration Ecology 23: 331-336. DOI:10.1111/rec.12228
Clewell A, McDonald T. 2009. Relevance of Natural Recovery to Ecological Restoration. Ecological Restoration 27: 122-124.
Crouzeilles R, Curran M, Ferreira MS, Lindenmayer DB, Grelle CEV, Benayas JMR. 2016. A global meta-analysis on the ecological drivers of forest restoration success. Nature Communications 7 DOI:10.1038/ncomms11666
Chazdon RL, Guariguata MR. 2016. Natural regeneration as a tool for large-scale forest restoration in the tropics: prospects and challenges. Biotropica 48: 716-730. DOI:10.1111/btp.12381
Díaz S, Demissew S, Carabias J, Joly C, Lonsdale M, Ash N, Larigauderie A, Adhikari JR, Arico S, Báldi A, Bartuska A, Baste IA, Bilgin A, Brondizio E, Chan KMA, Figueroa VE, Duraiappah A, Fischer M, Hill R, Koetz T, Leadley P, Lyver P, Mace GM, Martin-Lopez B, Okumura M, Pacheco D, Pascual U, Pérez ES, Reyers B, Roth E, Saito O, Scholes RJ, Sharma N, Tallis H, Thaman R, Watson R, Yahara T, Hamid ZA, Akosim C, Al-Hafedh Y, Allahverdiyev R, Amankwah E, Asah ST, Asfaw Z, Bartus G, Brooks LA, Caillaux J, Dalle G, Darnaedi D, Driver A, Erpul G, Escobar-Eyzaguirre P, Failler P, Fouda AMM, Fu B, Gundimeda H, Hashimoto S, Homer F, Lavorel S, Lichtenstein G, Mala WA, Mandivenyi W, Matczak P, Mbizvo C, Mehrdadi M, Metzger JP, Mikissa JB, Moller H, Mooney HA, Mumby P, Nagendra H, Nesshover C, Oteng-Yeboah AA, Pataki G, Roué M, Rubis J, Schultz M, Smith P, Sumaila R, Takeuchi K, Thomas S, Verma M, Yeo-Chang Y, Zlatanova D. 2015. The IPBES Conceptual Framework — connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 14: 1-16. DOI:10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002
Díaz S, Tilman D, Fargione J. 2005. Biodiversity Regulation of Ecosystem Services. In: Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (eds) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Current State and Trends. Washington: Island Press
FAO. 2016. State of the World’s Forests 2016. Forests and agriculture: land-use challenges and opportunities. Rome: FAO.
Gann GD, McDonald T, Walder B, Aronson J, Nelson CR, Jonson J, Hallett JG, Eisenberg C, Guariguata MR, Liu J, Hua F, Echeverría C, Gonzales E, Shaw N, Decleer K, Dixon KW. 2019. International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Second edition. Restoration Ecology 27: S1-S46. DOI:10.1111/rec.13035
Gobierno de México. 2019. Sembrando Vida. Programa de comunidades sustentables.
Guariguata MR, Brancalion PHS. 2014. Current Challenges and Perspectives for Governing Forest Restoration. Forests 5: 3022-3030. DOI:10.3390/f5123022
Guariguata MR, Ostertag R. 2001. Neotropical secondary forest succession: changes in structural and functional characteristics. Forest Ecology and Management 148: 185-206.
Gutiérrez MMT, Ayala BAM. 2013. Directorio mexicano de la conservación 2013. Ciudad de México: Fondo para la Comunicación y la Educación Ambiental, A.C.
Guzmán-Luna A, Martínez-Garza C. 2016. Performance of 15 tropical tree species recruited or transplanted on restoration settings. Botanical Sciences 94: 1-17. DOI:10.17129/botsci.659
Holdridge LR. 1967. Life Zone Ecology. San José, Costa Rica: Tropical Science Center.
Howe HF. 2016. Making dispersal syndromes and networks useful in tropical conservation and restoration. Global Ecology and Conservation 6: 152-178. DOI:10.1016/j.gecco.2016.03.002
Initiative-20x20. 2019. Iniciativa 20 X 20.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática (INEGI), Comisión Nacional para el Conocimientoy Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO), Instituto Nacional de Ecología (INE). 2008. Ecorregiones terrestres de México.
Karam-Gemael M, Loyola R, Penha J, Izzo T. 2018. Poor alignment of priorities between scientists and policymakers highlights the need for evidence-informed conservation in Brazil. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation 16: 125-132. DOI:10.1016/j.pecon.2018.06.002
Lamb D, Erskine PD, Parrotta JA. 2005. Restoration of degraded tropical forest landscapes. Science 310: 1628-1632. DOI:10.1126/science.1111773|ISSN 0036-8075
Latawiec AE, Crouzeilles R, Brancalion PHS, Rodrigues RR, Sansevero JB, Santos JSd, Mills M, Nave AG, Strassburg BB. 2016. Natural regeneration and biodiversity: a global meta-analysis and implications for spatial planning. Biotropica 48: 844-855. DOI:10.1111/btp.12386
Lebrija-Trejos E, Perez-Garcia EA, Meave JA, Poorter L, Bongers F. 2011. Environmental changes during secondary succession in a tropical dry forest in Mexico. Journal of Tropical Ecology 27: 477-489. DOI:10.1017/s0266467411000253
McDonald T, Gann G, Jonson J, Dixon K. 2016. International standards for the practice of ecological restoration - including principles and key concepts. Society for Ecological Restoration, Washington, D.C.
Meli P, Rey-Benayas JM, Brancalion PHS. 2019a. Balancing land sharing and sparing approaches to promote forest and landscape restoration in agricultural landscapes: Land approaches for forest landscape restoration. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation 17: 201-205. DOI:10.1016/j.pecon.2019.09.002
Meli P, Schweizer D, Brancalion PHS, Murcia C, Guariguata MR. 2019b. Multidimensional training among Latin America's restoration professionals. Restoration Ecology 27: 477-484. DOI:10.1111/rec.12933
Méndez-Toribio M, Martínez-Garza C, Ceccon E, Guariguata MR. 2018. La restauración de ecosistemas terrestres en México: situación actual, tendencias, necesidades y oportunidades. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR. ISBN: 978-602-387-074-5
Méndez-Toribio M, Martínez-Garza C, Cecconc E, Guariguata MR. 2017. Planes actuales de restauración ecológica en Latinoamérica: Avances y omisiones. Revista de Ciencias Ambientales 51: 30. DOI:10.15359/rca.51-2.1
Miles L, Newton AC, DeFries RS, Ravilious C, May I, Blyth S, Kapos V, Gordon JE. 2006. A global overview of the conservation status of tropical dry forests. Journal of Biogeography 33: 491-505. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01424.x
Murcia C, Guariguata M. 2014. La restauración ecológica en Colombia: Tendencias, necesidades y oportunidades. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.
Newton AC, del Castillo RF, Echeverria C, Geneletti D, Gonzalez-Espinosa M, Malizia LR, Premoli AC, Benayas JMR, Smith-Ramirez C, Williams-Linera G. 2012. Forest Landscape Restoration in the Drylands of Latin America. Ecology and Society 17 DOI:10.5751/es-04572-170121
Orsi F, Geneletti D. 2010. Identifying priority areas for Forest Landscape Restoration in Chiapas (Mexico): An operational approach combining ecological and socioeconomic criteria. Landscape and Urban Planning 94: 20-30. DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.07.014
Pinto SR, Melo F, Tabarelli M, Padovesi A, Mesquita CA, Scaramuzza CAD, Castro P, Carrascosa H, Calmon M, Rodrigues R, Cesar RG, Brancalion PHS. 2014. Governing and Delivering a Biome-Wide Restoration Initiative: The Case of Atlantic Forest Restoration Pact in Brazil. Forests 5: 2212-2229. DOI:10.3390/f5092212
Prevedello JA, Vieira MV. 2010. Does the type of matrix matter? A quantitative review of the evidence. Biodiversity and Conservation 19: 1205-1223. DOI:10.1007/s10531-009-9750-z
Rodrigues RR, Lima RAF, Gandolfi S, Nave AG. 2009. On the restoration of high diversity forests: 30 years of experience in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biological Conservation 142: 1242-1251. DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.12.008
SER. 2004. The SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. Society for Ecological Restoration Internacional Tucson, AZ, USA
Stanturf J, Mansourian S, Kleine M (eds). 2017. Implementing Forest Landscape Restoration, A Practitioner‘s Guide. International Union of Forest Research Organizations, Special Programme for Development of Capacities (IUFRO-SPDC) Vienna, Austria
Tobón W, Urquiza-Haas T, Koleff P, Schroter M, Ortega-Alvarez R, Campo J, Lindig-Cisneros R, Sarukhan J, Bonn A. 2017. Restoration planning to guide Aichi targets in a megadiverse country. Conservation Biology 31: 1086-1097. DOI:10.1111/cobi.12918
Uribe D, Geneletti D, del Castillo R, Orsi F. 2014. Integrating stakeholder preferences and GIS-based multicriteria analysis to identify forest landscape restoration priorities. Sustainability 6: 935-951.
Valderrama-Landeros LH, Rodríguez-Zúñiga MT, Troche-Souza C, Velázquez-Salazar S, Villeda-Chávez E, Alcántara-Maya JA, Vázquez-Balderas B, Cruz-López MI, Ressl R. 2017. Manglares de México: actualización y exploración de los datos del sistema de monitoreo 1970/1980–2015. Mexico City: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad.
Valiela I, Bowen JL, York JK. 2001. Mangrove Forests: One of the World's Threatened Major Tropical Environments. Bioscience 51: 807-815
Wilson KA, Lulow M, Burger J, Fang Y-C, Andersen C, Olson D, O’Connell M, McBride MF. 2011. Optimal restoration: accounting for space, time and uncertainty. Journal of Applied Ecology 48: 715-725. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01975.x
Zermeño-Hernandez I, Méndez-Toribio M, Siebe C, Benitez-Malvido J, Martínez-Ramos M. 2015. Ecological disturbance regimes caused by agricultural land uses and their effects on tropical forest regeneration. Applied Vegetation Science 18: 443-455. DOI:10.1111/avsc.12161
How to Cite
Martínez-Garza, C., Méndez-Toribio, M., Ceccon, E., & Guariguata, M. R. (2021). La Ecosystem restoration in Mexico: insights on the project planning phase. Botanical Sciences, 99(2), 242-256.