The structure of nectaries in the genus Strombocactus (Cactaceae)

Aldebaran Camacho-Velázquez, Salvador Arias, Judith Márquez-Guzmán, Sonia Vázquez-Santana


Background: Floral nectar is offered by the plant to its pollinators to promote cross-fertilization.

Questions: Are floral nectaries morpho-anatomically similar among the taxa of Strombocactus? What sugars do nectaries offer their pollinators?

Studied species: Strombocactus disciformis subsp. disciformis, S. disciformis subsp. esperanzae and S. corregidorae, during 2016-2018.

Methods: Bud flowers and flowers in anthesis from each taxon of Strombocactus, were processed to be observed in SEM; other specimens were embedded in Paraplast and sectioned to histochemical tests. The concentration of nectar was measured using a refractometer.

Results: The nectaries are similar among the three studied taxa, located below the stamens and reach the upper part of the ovary forming a ring in the hypanthium. An almost flat epidermis constitutes the nectary in S. disciformis subsp. esperanzae, although in S. disciformis subsp. disciformis is slightly bulked and papillae in S. corregidorae, a nectariferous parenchyma composed of metabolically very active cells, and a subnectariferous parenchyma of larger cells, associated with vascular bundles. The nectar is secreted through nectarostomata. The concentration of nectar was 8.65 ± 3.98, 16.12 ± 4.48 and 22.09 ± 7.42 °Brix for S. disciformis subsp. esperanzae, S. corregidorae and S. disciformis subsp. disciformis, respectively.

Conclusions: All taxa of Strombocactus have an annular-type nectary that secretes a low volume of nectar and together with pollen are offered as rewards. Based on other floral characteristics observed, such as the diurnal anthesis, the infundibuliform shape and the color of the flower, we propose that bees pollinate these species.


floral nectaries; nectar; nectarostomata; nectary chamber

Full Text:

PDF Figure S1


Almeida OJG, Cota-Sánchez JH, Paoli AAS. 2013. The systematic significance of floral morphology, nectaries, and nectar concentration in epiphytic cacti of tribes Hylocereeae and Rhipsalideae (Cactaceae). Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 15: 255-268. DOI:

Almeida OJG, Sartori-Paoli AA, Souza LA. 2010. Flower morpho-anatomy in Epiphyllum phyllanthus (Cactaceae). Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 81: 65-80. DOI:

Álvarez R, Godínez-Álvarez H, Guzmán U, Dávila P. 2004. Aspectos ecológicos de dos cactáceas mexicanas amenazadas: implicaciones para su conservación. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México 75: 7-16. DOI:

Anderson EF. 2001. The Cactus Family. Oregon: Timber Press Portland. ISBN: 978-0881924985

Arias S, Sánchez-Martínez E. 2010. Una especie nueva de Strombocactus (Cactaceae) del río Moctezuma Querétaro, México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 81: 619-624. DOI:

Baker HG, Baker I. 1983. Floral nectar sugar constituents in relation to pollinator type. In: Jones CE, Little RJ, eds. Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology. New York: Scientific an Academic Editions, 117-141. ISBN: 0-442-2467-5

Baker HG, Baker I. 1990. The predictive value of nectar chemistry to the recognition of pollinator types. Israel Journal of Botany 39: 157-166. DOI:

Bernardello G. 2007. A systematic survey of floral nectaries. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E, eds. Nectaries and Nectar. New York: Springer, 19-128. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5937-7; ISBN: 978-1-4020-5936-0

Britton NL, Rose JN. 1922. The Cactaceae, third vol. Washington DC: The Carnegie Institution of Washington. DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.46288

Buxbaum F. 1953. Morphology of Cacti. Section II: Morphology of the Flower. Pasadena: Abbey Garden Press, 93-170.

Cruden RW, Hermann SM, Peterson S. 1983. Patterns of nectar production and plant pollinator coevolution. In: Bentley B, Elias T, eds. The Biology of Nectaries. New York: Columbia University Press, 80-125. ISBN-13: 978-0231044462

De Candolle AP. 1828. Revue de la famille des cactées. Mémoires du Muséum D´Histoire Naturelle 17: 1-119.

Del Castillo RF. 1994. Polinización y otros aspectos de la biología floral de Ferocactus histrix. Cactáceas y Suculentas Mexicanas 39: 36-42.

Díaz-Castelazo C, Rico-Gray V, Ortega F, Ángeles G. 2005. Morphological and secretory characterization of extrafloral nectaries in plants of coastal Veracruz, México. Annals of Botany 96: 1175-1189. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mci270

Domínguez C, Pérez JR. 2013. La biología de la polinización. En: Márquez- Guzmán J, Collazo-Ortega M, Martínez-Gordillo M, Orozco-Segovia A, Vázquez-Santana S, eds. Biología de Angiospermas. Ciudad de México: Prensas de la Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM, 101-109. ISBN: 9786070227059

Faegri K, Van Der Pijl L. 1979. The Principles of Pollination Ecology. Oxford: Pergamon. ISBN: 978-0-08-023160-0

Fahn A. 1979. Ultrastructure of nectaries in relation to nectar secretion. American Journal of Botany 66: 977-985. DOI:

Fahn A. 1988. Secretory tissues in vascular plants. New Phytologist 108(3): 229-257. DOI:

Fenster CB, Armbruster WS, Wilson P, Dudash MR, Thomson JD. 2004. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35: 375-403. DOI:

Fuentes-Pérez M. 2004. Anatomía floral de siete especies de la tribu Pachycereeae (Cactaceae). BSc Thesis, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Fuentes-Pérez M. 2008. Estudio comparativo de la anatomía floral en Opuntioideae K. Schum. (Cactaceae). MSc Thesis, Institución de Enseñanza e Investigación en Ciencias Agrícolas. Colegio de Posgraduados.

Fuentes-Pérez M, Terrazas T, Arias S. 2009. Anatomía floral de cinco especies de Opuntia (Opuntioideae, Cactaceae) de México. Polibotánica 27: 89-102.

Grajales-Conesa J, Meléndez-Ramírez V, Cruz-López L. 2011. Aromas florales y su interacción con los insectos polinizadores. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 82: 1356-1367. DOI:

Gudiño W, Márquez-Guzmán J, de la Barrera E. 2015. Structural implications for nectar secretion by nectaries of three columnar cacti. Maejo International Journal of Science and Technology 9: 156-164. DOI:

Heil M, McKey D. 2003. Protective ant–plant interactions as model systems in ecological and evolutionary research. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34: 425-453. DOI:

Hernández HM, Gómez-Hinostrosa C, Goettsch B. 2004. Checklist of Chihuahuan Desert Cactaceae. Harvard papers in Botany 9: 51-68.

Irwin RE, Adler LS, Brody AK. 2004. The dual role of floral traits: pollinator attraction and plant defense. Ecology 85: 1503–1511. DOI:

Leins P, Erbar C. 2010. Flower and Fruit: Morphology, Ontogeny, Phylogeny, Function and Ecology. Stuttgart: Schweizerbart Science Publishers. ISBN-13: 978-3510652617

López-Curto ML, Márquez-Guzmán J, Murguía-Sánchez G. 2005. Técnicas para el Estudio del Desarrollo en Angiospermas. Ciudad de México: Prensas de la Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM. ISBN: 968-36-4822-3

Márquez-Guzmán J, Wong R, Pérez M, López L, Murguía G. 2016. Técnicas de Laboratorio para el Estudio del Desarrollo en Angiospermas. Ciudad de México: Prensas de la Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM. ISBN: 9786070282522

Mauseth DF. 1982. Development and ultrastructure of extrafloral nectaries in Ancistrocactus scheeri (Cactaceae). Botanical Gazette 143: 273-277. DOI:

Nepi M. 2007. Nectary structure and ultrastructure. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E, eds. Nectaries and Nectar. New York: Springer, 129-166. ISBN: 978-90-481-7481-2

Nicolson SW, Thornburg R. 2007. Nectar chemistry. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E, eds. Nectaries and Nectar. New York: Springer, 215-264. ISBN: 978-90-481-7481-2

Oliveira PS, Rico-Gray V, Díaz-Castelazo C, Castillo-Guevara C. 1999. Interaction between ants, extrafloral nectaries and insect herbivores in Neotropical coastal sand dunes: herbivore deterrence by visiting ants increases fruit set in Opuntia stricta (Cactaceae). Functional Ecology 13: 623–631. DOI:

Pacini E, Nepi M, Vesprini JL. 2003. Nectar biodiversity: a short review. Plant Systematics and Evolution 238: 7-21. DOI:

Pacini E, Nicolson S. 2007. Introduction. In: Nicolson SW, Nepi M, Pacini E, eds. Nectaries and Nectar. New York: Springer, 1-18. ISBN: 978-90-481-7481-2

Pickett CH, Clark WD. 1979. The function of extrafloral nectaries in Opuntia acanthocarpa (Cactaceae). American Journal of Botany 66: 618-625. DOI:

Proctor M, Yeo P, Lack A. 1996. The Natural History of Pollination. London: HarperCollins Publishers. ISBN-13: 978-0881923520

Richards AJ. 1986. Plant Breeding Systems. Boston: Allen & Unwin. ISBN: 9780045810208

Ruffner GA, Clark WD. 1986. Extrafloral nectar of Ferocactus acanthodes (Cactaceae): Composition and its importance to ants. American Journal of Botany 73: 185-189. DOI:

Sánchez-Martínez E, Chávez-Martínez RJ, Hernández-Oria JG, Hernández-Martínez MM. 2006. Especies de Cactáceas Prioritarias para la Conservación en la Zona Árida Queretano-Hidalguense. Querétaro: Consejo de Ciencia y Tecnología del Estado de Querétaro.

Simpson BB, Neff JL. 1983. Evolution and diversity of floral rewards. In: Jones CE, Little RJ, eds. Handbook of Experimental Pollination Biology. New York: Scientific an Academic Editions, 142-159. ISBN: 0-442-2467-5

Stpiczynska M, Milanesi C, Faleri C, Cresta M. 2005. Ultrastructure of the nectary spur of Platanthera chlorantha (Custer) Rchb. (Orchidaceae) during successive stages of nectar secretion. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia Series Botanica 47: 111-119.

Suárez M, Diana X. 2003. Guía de Procesos para la Elaboración de Néctares, Mermeladas, Uvas Pasas y Vinos. Bogotá: Convenio Andrés Bello.

Tapia HJ, Bárcenas-Argüello ML, Terrazas T, Arias S. 2017. Phylogeny and circumscription of Cephalocereus (Cactaceae) based on molecular and morphological evidence. Systematic Botany 42: 1-15. DOI:

Torres-Sánchez DE. 2013. Estructura de los nectarios florales en miembros de la Tribu Pachycereeae (Cactaceae Juss.). BSc. Thesis. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

Urías J. 2009. Anatomía de las estructuras reproductivas de Stenocereus alamonsensis (J. M. Coult.) A. C. Gibson y K. E. Horak (Cactaceae). MSc. Thesis, Colegio de Posgraduados, México.

Vázquez-Sánchez M, Terrazas T, Arias S, Ochoterena H. 2013. Molecular phylogeny, origin and taxonomic implications of the tribe Cacteae (Cactaceae). Systematics and Biodiversity 11: 103-116. DOI:

Villamil N, Márquez-Guzmán J, Boege K. 2013. Understanding ontogenetic trajectories of indirect defense: ecological and anatomical constraints in the production of extrafloral nectaries. Annals of Botany 112: 701-709. DOI:


Article Metrics

Abstract Views.
Total number of Abstract Views for this article.
a description of the source 183
This journal

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM


  • There are currently no refbacks.


Botanical Sciences is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes scientific papers in plant sciences. The arguments, figures / schemes / photographs, quality and the general contents of this publication are full responsibility of the authors, and not commit the Editor- in-Chief or the Sociedad Botánica de México.

Botanical Sciences year 8, Vol. 97, No. 1, January-March 2019. Quarterly publication edited and published by Sociedad Botánica de México A.C. ( Editor in Chief Salvador Arias, Jardín Botánico, Instituto de Biología, 3er Circuito s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Delegación Coyoacán, C.P. 04510. Reserves of Rights to the Exclusive Use No. 04-2017-040716054100-203, digital-ISSN 2007-4476, both granted by the Instituto Nacional del Derecho de Autor. Responsible for updating the page Pedro López, email:, eScire. Last update March 11, 2019.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.



website counter